Cook v. Kilgo
Cook v. Kilgo
111 Ga. 817; 35 S.E. 673; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 749
Cook v. Kilgo
Opinion of the Court
1. An exception to the overruling of a motion to rulé out “all evidence that went behind the settlement,” without setting forth either literally or in substance the evidence referred to, will not be considered. Petty v. Brunswick & W. Ry. Co., 109 Ga. 666, and cases cited.
2. There being no specific assignment of error upon the charge excepted to,
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.