Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co. v. Cathcart
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co. v. Cathcart
111 Ga. 818; 35 S.E. 640; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 751
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co. v. Cathcart
Opinion of the Court
No legal reason appears from the allegations of the petition why the plaintiff, without seeking an injunction, is not possessed of an adequate remedy at law to prevent the enforcement of the executions issued on the judgments which it claims were illegally rendered; nor do the facts disclose a case in which the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction to protect it from a multiplicity of suits.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.