Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co. v. Cathcart

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided April 9, 1900 · Little

111 Ga. 818; 35 S.E. 640; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 751

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Chadwick v. Dolinoff (Ga. 1951)
Johnson v. Gilmer (Ga. 1901)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Little, J.

No legal reason appears from the allegations of the petition why the plaintiff, without seeking an injunction, is not possessed of an adequate remedy at law to prevent the enforcement of the executions issued on the judgments which it claims were illegally rendered; nor do the facts disclose a case in which the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction to protect it from a multiplicity of suits.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton county. . January 13, 1900.

Dorsey, Brewster & Howell, Hugh M. Dorsey, and Arthur Hey-man, for plaintiff. M. A. Hale and T. C. Battle, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.