Harmon v. State
Harmon v. State
111 Ga. 829; 35 S.E. 654; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 773
Opinion of the Court
The sole question presented here being whether the evidence was sufficient to identify the accused as the perpetrator of the of- ' fense, and there being positive testimony warranting a finding that he was the guilty party, it does not appear that the court abused its discretion in denying a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.