Lindsey v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Thurmond v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HALL COUNTY (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
- Smith v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
- Aycock v. State (Ga. 1939)
- State v. Goetz (N.D. 1911)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. It is too late, after verdict, to complain that the proper questions were not propounded to jurors while they were being examined on their voir dire. See Smith v. State, 63 Ga. 168-9. And were it otherwise, a new trial should not be granted for such a cause when the questions actually propounded were, in substance, the same as those prescribed by the statute, and did not vary therefrom save in immaterial respects as to phraseology.
2. The evidence in this case, though entirely circumstantial, was sufficiently strong and conclusive to warrant a finding that the accused was guilty and to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.