Stapleton v. Monroe
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Holmes v. Henderson (Ga. 2001)
- Mason v. Blayton (Ga. Ct. App. 1969)
- Turpin v. North American Acceptance Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 1969)
- Knight v. William Summerlin Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1969)
- Housing Authority v. Kolokuris (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
- Savannah News-Press, Inc. v. Hartridge (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)
- Steinmetz v. Chambley (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
- Jones v. Lawman (Ga. Ct. App. 1937)
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Beverland (Idaho 1923)
- Cole v. Bank of Bowersville (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
- Fountain v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1918)
- Buck v. St. Louis Union Trust Co. (Mo. 1916)
- Kerr v. Holder (Ga. Ct. App. 1913)
- Matthews & Son v. Richards (Ga. Ct. App. 1913)
- American Harrow Co. v. Dolvin (Ga. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. An absolute and unconditional promissory note can not be so changed by evidence of a contemporaneous parol agreement as to engraft upon it a condition. Civil Code, §3675.
2. If, in the trial of a case; one party introduce immaterial and illegal evidence without objection, the other party is not thereby entitled to introduce, over objection, other illegal evidence in rebuttal. There can be no equation of errors in the trial of a case. Woolfolk v. State, 81 Ga. 552.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.