Cox v. Cagle & Sons
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Slappey v. Slappey (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The general lien given to laborers under the Civil Code, § 2792, upon all the property of their employers, and the special lien on the products of their labor, given under the Civil Code, § 2793, arise only for the amount due for the work done.
2. It follows from what is above announced, that when a contract between an employer and an employee provides for the labor of the latter as well as for the use of his property, the employee is entitled to a laborer’s lien only for the work done, and not for the hire of his property.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.