Concord Variety Works v. Beckham
Concord Variety Works v. Beckham
112 Ga. 242; 37 S.E. 392; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 115
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bailey v. Ins. Co. of North America (Ga. Ct. App. 1949)
- Bailey v. Insurance Co. of North America (Ga. Ct. App. 1949)
- Center Point Gin v. Hathcock (Ga. Ct. App. 1922)
- McDonald v. Hardee (Ga. Ct. App. 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where cotton is delivered by the owner to another to be ginned for a specified price, this is a bailment for hire. Therefore, where the cotton is lost by the bailee, the onus is upon him to show due care and diligence in protecting and keeping it.
2. No such care and diligence was shown in the present case.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.