Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.
Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.
112 Ga. 305; 37 S.E. 379; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132
Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.
Opinion of the Court
1. Absence of a party for providential cause is not aground for a continuance of the case, unless his counsel states in his place that he can’not go safely to trial without the presence of his client. Civil Code, § 5131.
2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for anew trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.