Harvey v. Bowles
Harvey v. Bowles
112 Ga. 363; 37 S.E. 363; 1900 Ga. LEXIS 159
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dryman v. Watts (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)
- Denney v. Tate (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
- Brenner v. Wright (Ga. 1936)
- Murray v. Davidson (Ga. 1932)
- Brooks v. Jackins (Ga. Ct. App. 1928)
- Folds v. Harris (Ga. Ct. App. 1925)
- Carr v. Carr (Ga. 1924)
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County (Ga. 1922)
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County (Ga. Ct. App. 1922)
- Cox v. Grady (Ga. 1909)
- McCain v. College Park (Ga. 1901)
- Harvey v. Bowles (Ga. 1900)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The first grant of a new trial, though predicated exclusively on special legal grounds, will not be disturbed by this court, unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict complained of was absolutely demanded. Weinkle v. Railroad Co., 107 Ga. 367; Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 112 Ga. 253.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.