Britt v. State
Britt v. State
112 Ga. 583; 37 S.E. 886; 1901 Ga. LEXIS 15
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rogers v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)
- Cason v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1919)
- Wilcox v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
- Cargill v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1913)
- James v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1919)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The exercise of due diligence on the part of the accused and his counsel would have enabled them to discover before the jury was empanelled that two of the jurors selected to try the case were members of the grand jury that found the bill. See Jones v. State, 95 Ga. 497.
2. The evidence fully warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed,.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.