Swift v. Security Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia January 29, 1901

Swift v. Security Investment Co., 112 Ga. 736 (Ga. 1901)

37 S.E. 968; 1901 Ga. LEXIS 74

Fish

Opinion of the Court

Fish, J.

In view of the pleadings and evidence appearing in the record, it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior court. June 27, 1900.

W. H. Terrell and S. C. Tapp, for plaintiff. King & Anderson and Tompkins & Alston, for defendants.

Reference

Full Case Name: Swift v. Security Investment Company
Status: Published