Young v. State
Young v. State
112 Ga. 765; 38 S.E. 79; 1901 Ga. LEXIS 86
Young v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence as a whole, though circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that the accused, in connection with others, was guilty of the offense of which he was convicted. This being so, and all the special grounds of the motion for a new trial having been in this court abandoned, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.