Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Hurt
Opinion of the Court
1. The assignment of error as to admitting evidence does not disclose what objection wásmade thereto when offered, and consequently is without merit here.
2. This was an action against a railroad company for personal injuries, in which the plaintiff established his own freedom from fault; and, under his pleadings and the evidence, it was a question for the jury whether he was injured in one of the ordinary risks of his employment or because of the negligence of fel
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.