Duke v. Story
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Petersen v. Ohio Copper Co. (Utah 1928)
- Carreker v. Thornton (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)
- Hamilton v. United States (D.C. 1943)
- Darden v. Roberts (Ga. 1942)
- Peyton v. Rylee (Ga. 1940)
- Grahl v. Dorsey (Ga. Ct. App. 1937)
- Bright v. Auto Finance & Loan Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Cochran (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)
- Newton v. Roberts (Ga. 1926)
- Earnest v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1919)
- Earnest v. State (Ga. 1918)
- Gross v. Wilds (Ga. Ct. App. 1918)
- Shaw Bros. v. Guthrie (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
- Whidden v. Merry (Ga. Ct. App. 1911)
- Carreker v. Thornton (Ga. Ct. App. 1907)
- Kelly & Jones Co. v. Moore (Ga. 1906)
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Murphey & Hunt (Ga. 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
An action was brought by Story and others against M. N. Duke, to which M. J. Duke Was subsequently made a party defendant. A trial was had, a verdict for the plaintiffs was returned, and a judgment was entered thereon. The Dukes sued out a bill of exceptions alleging error in the rendition of this judgment. It appears, however, that they also filed a motion for a new trial, which was still pending when the bill of exceptions was certified. The case is therefore prematurely here, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Mitchell v. Tomlin, 64 Ga. 368; Williams v. Jones, 69 Ga. 277, s. c. Id. 757: McLendon v. W. & A. R. Co., 85 Ga. 129. Writ of error dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.