Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902

Gildea v. Hill

Gildea v. Hill
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided April 2, 1902 · Simmons
115 Ga. 136; 41 S.E. 492; 1902 Ga. LEXIS 327
Gildea v. Hill

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Simmons, C. J.

1. Where a jury in a justice’s court return a verdict for the defendant, it is not error for the judge of the superior court to grant a new trial upon certiorari, when the answer of the justice discloses that the jury in the justice’s court improperly carried to their room a written document which was not introduced in evidence and which, if read hy the jury, was calculated to injure the plaintiff.

2. At the hearing of a certiorari in the superior court, nothing can he considered hy the judge hut the petition and answer. It follows that it was not error for the judge to refuse to consider affidavits hy members of the jury to the effect that they had not read or considered the paper improperly carried into the jury-room.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.