Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902

Conwell v. Neal

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided April 29, 1902 · Lumpkin

115 Ga. 421; 41 S.E. 629; 1902 Ga. LEXIS 434

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Bainbridge Farm Co. v. Ball (Ga. 1928)
Conwell v. Neal (Ga. 1903)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, P. J.

An equitable petition to enjoin a pending action at law and bring the plaintiff therein to a settlement of certain cross-demands is not good when insolvency is not alleged, and when no reason appears why the plaintiff in the equitable proceeding can not, in defense to such action, set up those cross-demands against the other party.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.