1. That an auditorwas not sworn according to law does not constitute a ground for an exception of fact to his report. The proper remedy in such a case is a motion, in due time, to recommit the case to the auditor.

2. The auditor’s conclusions of fact as set forth in his report were supported by the evidence ; his conclusions of law as therein stated are in accordance with the rulings and decision in the case of Harrison v. Harrison, 105 Ga. 517 ; there was no error in the rulings made on the admission of evidence, of sufficient materiality to affect the result; and it does not appear that the trial judge committed any error in making the auditor’s report the judgment in the case.

Judgment affirmed.