Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902

Walters v. Freeman

Walters v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided October 30, 1902 · Cóbb
116 Ga. 423; 42 S.E. 741; 1902 Ga. LEXIS 122
Walters v. Freeman

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Cóbb, J.

While the case for plaintiff in error appeals more strongly to this court than that for the defendant in error, yet as a jury of the vicinage has seen proper to render a verdict for the defendant in error, in a case turning upon questions of fact, the judge who presided in the case has approved the verT diet, and the motion for a new trial is confined to the general grounds, this court, in accordance with the rule of non-interference in such cases, feels constrained to affirm the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.'

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.