Miller v. Slade & Farish
Miller v. Slade & Farish
116 Ga. 772; 43 S.E. 69; 1902 Ga. LEXIS 254
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Anderson Banking Co. v. Chandler (Ga. 1921)
- Morgan v. Nashville Grain Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1913)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It was not erroneous to sustain a demurrer to a plea alleging that the promissory note sued on had been altered without defendant’s consent, when, even if the alleged alteration was in the note and material, there was no allegation that it was made with intent to defraud. Civil Code, §3702; Burch v. Pope, 114 Ga. 334.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.