Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903

Brice v. State

Brice v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 19, 1903 · Eamar
117 Ga. 466; 43 S.E. 715; 1903 Ga. LEXIS 267
Brice v. State

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Eamar, J.

1. The grounds of a motion for a new trial must he approved by the judge; and if the certificate appended thereto states facts in conflict with the statements in the motion, or leaves it uncertain as to whether the facts therein alleged actually occurred, the assignment of error can not be considered by this court. Fletcher v. Collins, 111 Ga. 253 (1).

2. Where a defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that he was not present at a time when the judge recharged the jury, such ground can not be considered, when from the certificate of the judge it does not certainly appear that the prisoner was not present.

3. The verdict is sustained by the evidence, there was no error in the charge or refusals to charge, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.