Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Georgia
Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden, 117 Ga. 822 (Ga. 1903)
45 S.E. 59; 1903 Ga. LEXIS 350
Eisii

Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden

Opinion of the Court

Eisii, J.

An entry made by a proper officer upon an execution issued from a judgment rendered in 'a justice’s court, unless recorded upon the execution docket of the superior court of the county where the defendant resides, will not, even as between the parties to the judgment, arrest the running of the dormancy statute. Civil Code, §§ 3761, 3762; Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.Affidavit of illegality. Before W. S. Upshaw, judge pro hac vice. Morgan superior court. September 1, 1902. .J. R. Rolland, for plaintiffs. George <& Anderson, for defendant.

Reference

Full Case Name
Smith, Barry & Company v. Bearden
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published