1. When in the trial of a criminal case the judge has charged fully on the subject of reasonable doubt as applied to the whole case, it is not error to refuse a request to give in charge the following, even if the same were sound: “ That in order to impeach a witness in this case by contradictory statements previously made, the jury must believe the testimony to *120that effect.by the impeaching witness to a moral and reasonable certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt, under the rules of reasonable doubts given by the court.”

2.. While the evidence was conflicting, it was sufficient to sustain the verdict, « and the judge did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.