Ray v. Ray
Ray v. Ray
120 Ga. 25; 47 S.E. 570; 1904 Ga. LEXIS 434
Ray v. Ray
Opinion of the Court
While there was strong circumstantial evidence to the effect that subsequently to the separation of the parties the wife had been guilty of adultery, there was also evidence to contradict this contention ; and it can not be said that the court abused its discretion in awarding the plaintiff temporary alimony and attorney’s f,ees.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.