Hicks v. State
Hicks v. State
120 Ga. 176; 47 S.E. 547; 1904 Ga. LEXIS 486
Hicks v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. This case was argued by brief. Assignments of error set forth in an amendment to a motion for a new trial, but not insisted on in the brief filed by counsel for the plaintiff in error, will be treated as having been abandoned. Moss v. Bohanon, 111 Ga. 871.
2. There was ample evidence to warrant the verdict; and no error of law appearing, and the finding of the jury having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.