Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905

Buck & Downing v. Nicholls Manufacturing Co.

Buck & Downing v. Nicholls Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 4, 1905 · Cobb
122 Ga. 255; 50 S.E. 82; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 165
Buck & Downing v. Nicholls Manufacturing Co.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Cobb, J.

This was an action for damages for cutting the timber on described lots of land. At the trial the plaintiffs failed to recover, and they except to the overruling of their motion for a new trial. The controlling issue in the case was title. The plaintiffs relied on prescription, and undertook to show possession for seven years under color. The court, however, rejected certain conveyances offered by the plaintiffs, without which there could be no recovery in their favor. The rejection of these conveyances was made the subject of assignments of error in the amended motion for a new trial; but, under the rale stated in the first headnote, these assignments can not be considered. There was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.