Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.
Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.
122 Ga. 385; 50 S.E. 121; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 216
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Daniel v. Mitchell (Ga. 1933)
- Sampson v. Smith (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
- Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
- Parks v. Stevens (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
- McCarty v. Mobley (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
- Cox v. Grady (Ga. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
If the verdict was not demanded by the law and the evidence, the Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, though it was put upon a single ground ; nor will it determine whether the trial court was right in granting the motion on the special ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.