Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.
Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.
122 Ga. 605; 50 S.E. 342; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 278
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- A., B. & C. Railroad Benefit Ass'n v. South (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where there is nothing to show that a letter has been lost, it-is not error to refuse to admit secondary evidence as to its contents.
2, There being no complaint made of the charge of the court, and the testimony, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the finding, this court will not interfere with his refusal to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.