Bowles v. Wicker
Bowles v. Wicker
122 Ga. 644; 50 S.E. 476; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 288
Bowles v. Wicker
Opinion of the Court
1. The portion of the charge excepted to stated a correct abstract proposition of law. This being true, this court, as has been frequently ruled, will not, under a mere general assignment of error, inquire whether the charge excepted to was or was not adjusted to the facts of the particular case.
2. The evidence warranted the verdict and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirm,ed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.