Woodley v. Coker
Woodley v. Coker
122 Ga. 832; 50 S.E. 936; 1905 Ga. LEXIS 344
Woodley v. Coker
Opinion of the Court
1. The refusal to give the charges set forth in the motion for new trial was not error, they being covered, in so far as they are pertinent and legal, by the general charge.
% Under the facts disclosed by the record there was no error in any of the charges complained of.
3. The evidence fully authorized the verdict and the trial judge did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.