Southern Railway Co. v. Rumsey
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- McDonald v. Vaughan (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. York (Ga. 1907)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. There were no errors of law complained of. The questions as to the negligence of the defendant and the diligence of the plaintiff were peculiarly for the jury. The evidence made a case which was at. best close and doubtful. The amount of the verdict indicates that the jury treated the case as one in which an apportionment of damages was proper. As the finding of the'jury has been approved by the trial judge, this court will not control his discretion in overruling the motion for a. new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.