Raven v. State
Raven v. State
125 Ga. 58; 53 S.E. 816; 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45
Raven v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. When a controversy has arisen between counsel for the accused and the solicitor as to whether or not the venue has been proved,, it is not error for the court to state that a witness testified that the offense occurred in the county, such being the fact. It follows, that a motion to declare a mistrial because of such statement by the court was. properly overruled. Wiggins v. State, 80 Ga. 468; Barnes v. State, 89 Ga. 316.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been, shown for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.