Southern Printers' Supply Co. v. Felker
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Peacock Construction Co. v. Turner Concrete, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
- Bland v. Davison-Paxon Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1951)
- Bridges v. Ramsey Sign Service Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Henry Darling Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)
- Weathercraft Co. v. Byrd (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
- Myers v. Aarons (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
- Chatham Abattoir & Packing Co. v. Painter Engineering Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1922)
- Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
- Shedd v. Standard Sewing Machine Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
- Blue Ridge Lumber Co. v. Greenwood (Ga. 1911)
- Coaling Coal & Coke Co. v. Howard (Ga. 1908)
- Alabama Construction Co. v. Continental Car & Equipment Co. (Ga. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where suit was brought on an open account for an indebtedness, and on the trial it appeared that there was a written contract between the parties, which was introduced, and the evidence for the-plaintiff was to the effect that there had been complete performance by it of its part of the contract and nothing remained to be done but for the defendant to make payment, it was error to grant a nonsuit. Hancock v. Ross, 18 Ga. 304; Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 594; Burch v. Harrell, Id. 719; Johnson v. Quin, 52 Ga. 485; Schmidt v. Wambacker, 62 Ga. 321.
2. The case of Blue v. Ford, 12 Ga. 45, has been distinguished from rulings-of the character here made, on the ground that the plaintiff had not fully completed his contract. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 598.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.