Grant v. State
Grant v. State
125 Ga. 281; 54 S.E. 182; 1906 Ga. LEXIS 132
Grant v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and, the court having approved it, this court will not interfere. The jury in finding the defendant guilty necessarily found the existence of all the elements of the crime, including the animus furandi.
2. The charge was quite brief, and might have been fuller; but under the facts of the case, and in the absence of any request to charge, it was not so entirely insufficient as to require a new trial.
Jiidgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.