Coody v. State
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Baker v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
- Fears v. State (Ga. 1906)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. It will not require a new trial that the presiding judge failed to charge the jury that they might consider the state of the feelings of the witnesses for the prosecution toward the accused;' there being no request to charge on that subject.
2. Considering the note of the presiding judge in connection with the grounds of the motion for a new trial, no error of law requiring a new trial was committed; and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.