Jackson v. Augusta Southern Railroad
Jackson v. Augusta Southern Railroad
125 Ga. 801; 54 S.E. 697; 1906 Ga. LEXIS 282
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hudson v. Sadtler (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)
- Cadow v. Dixson Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
- Alropa Corporation v. Rossee (5th Cir. 1936)
- Marshall v. Walker (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
- Johnson v. International Agricultural Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)
- Baxley Hardware Co. v. Morris (Ga. 1927)
- Marbut v. Hamilton (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
- Anderson v. Peteet (Ga. Ct. App. 1909)
- Burkhalter v. Perry & Brown (Ga. 1907)
- Hawes v. Gloves (Ga. 1906)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In order to render a promissory note a sealed instrument, it must be so recited in the body of the note. The mere addition of a seal after the signature of the maker is insufficient. Civil Code, §3765; Chambers v. Kingsberry, 68 Ga. 828; Ridley v. Hightower, 112 Ga. 479; Echols v. Phillips, 112 Ga. 700.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.