Brown v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust Company (Ga. 1945)
- Snyder v. Elkan (Ga. 1938)
- Gary v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
- Henderson v. Ellarbee (Ga. Ct. App. 1926)
- Hoffman v. Franklin Motor Car Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
- National Pencil Co. v. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
- Henry & Hutchinson, Inc. v. Slack (Ga. Ct. App. 1955)
- Stark v. Jacobs (Ga. Ct. App. 1938)
- Arrington v. Horton (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. D'Avignon (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
- Brown v. Tomberlin (Ga. 1912)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. While a defendant may file an answer to an amendment to the petition in a ease, admitting or denying material allegations in the same, or stating why he can neither admit nor deny them, he is not required to file an answer to the amendment, and his failure to do so does not authorize the court or jury to treat the allegations in the amendment as being admitted. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (46 S. E. 874).
2. Upon the controlling question raised in the record, this case is ruled by the decision in the case of Hawkins v. Central of Georgia Railway Company, 119 Ga. 159 (46 S. E. 82).
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.