Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909

Kennedy v. Hagans

Kennedy v. Hagans
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided April 19, 1909 · Atkinson
132 Ga. 503; 64 S.E. 330; 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343

Counsel

Brannen & Booth and K. B. Strange, for plaintiff in error., J. J. B. Anderson and B. Lee, contra.

Kennedy v. Hagans

Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which selects several fragments of sentences from different parts of the charge of the court, which are incomplete and unintelligible as set out in such ground, is not sufficiently definite to present any question for determination by this court. Holland v. Williams, 126 Ga. 617 (55 S. E. 1023).

2. The evidence which was introduced without objection was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Jtistices coneur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.