Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Georgia /Cases /Supreme Court of Georgia /

1909

413 Supreme Court of Georgia opinions from 1909.

  • City of Lagrange v. Troup County 64 S.E. 267, (Ga. 1909)
  • Holloway v. Macon Gas Light & Water Co. 64 S.E. 330, (Ga. 1909)
  • Neal v. Boykin 64 S.E. 480, (Ga. 1909)
  • Brumby v. City of Marietta 64 S.E. 321, (Ga. 1909)
  • Moore v. State 64 S.E. 264, (Ga. 1909)
  • Shelton v. State 64 S.E. 262, (Ga. 1909)
  • Cooper v. National Fertilizer Co. 64 S.E. 650, (Ga. 1909)
  • Millirons v. State 63 S.E. 1113, (Ga. 1909)
  • Lewis v. Lewis 63 S.E. 1114, (Ga. 1909)
  • Burns v. Vereen 64 S.E. 113, (Ga. 1909)
  • Motz v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. 64 S.E. 79, (Ga. 1909)
  • Scott v. Jordan 63 S.E. 1115, (Ga. 1909)
  • McClaren v. Williams 64 S.E. 65, (Ga. 1909)
  • Gillespie v. Powell 64 S.E. 80, (Ga. 1909)
  • Ellis v. Ellis 63 S.E. 1102, (Ga. 1909)
  • Whigham v. Fountain 63 S.E. 1115, (Ga. 1909)
  • Pusser v. Thompson 64 S.E. 75, (Ga. 1909)
  • Long v. Rose 64 S.E. 84, (Ga. 1909)
  • Culver v. Lambert 64 S.E. 82, (Ga. 1909)
  • Flury v. Hightower Box & Tank Co. 64 S.E. 72, (Ga. 1909)
  • Peginis v. City of Atlanta 63 S.E. 857, (Ga. 1909)
  • Stalvey v. Stalvey 64 S.E. 91, (Ga. 1909)
  • Robertson v. Heath 64 S.E. 73, (Ga. 1909)
  • Town of Maysville v. Smith 64 S.E. 131, (Ga. 1909)
  • Mackenzie v. Minis 63 S.E. 900, (Ga. 1909)
  • City of Rome v. Rome Hotel Co. 63 S.E. 830, (Ga. 1909)
  • Jones v. State 63 S.E. 1114, (Ga. 1909)
  • Lowe v. State 63 S.E. 1114, (Ga. 1909)
  • Peterson v. State 63 S.E. 1120, (Ga. 1909)
  • Williams v. Giddens 64 S.E. 64, (Ga. 1909)
  • Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta 63 S.E. 1120, (Ga. 1909)
  • Herndon v. Colquitt County 64 S.E. 60, (Ga. 1909)
  • Ford v. Commercial Industrial Co. 63 S.E. 1120, (Ga. 1909)
  • Lee v. Pearson 63 S.E. 1102, (Ga. 1909)
  • Morris v. Dougherty 63 S.E. 1114, (Ga. 1909)
  • Almon v. Garrett 63 S.E. 1103, (Ga. 1909)
  • Stark v. Cummings 63 S.E. 857, (Ga. 1909)
  • Dixon v. Minnesota Lumber Co. 64 S.E. 71, (Ga. 1909)
  • Willis v. Fields 63 S.E. 828, (Ga. 1909)
  • Price v. High Shoals Manufacturing Co. 64 S.E. 87, (Ga. 1909)
  • Satterfield v. Tate 64 S.E. 60, (Ga. 1909)
  • Hawkins v. Studdard 63 S.E. 852, (Ga. 1909)
  • Hawkinsville & Florida Southern Railway Co. v. Livingston 63 S.E. 832, (Ga. 1909)
  • Stewart & Brother v. Davis-Sears Lumber Co. 63 S.E. 817, (Ga. 1909)
  • Herrington v. Jones 63 S.E. 832, (Ga. 1909)
  • Leathers v. Leathers 63 S.E. 1118, (Ga. 1909)
  • Wilson v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. 63 S.E. 1121, (Ga. 1909)
  • Williams v. Garbutt Lumber Co. 64 S.E. 65, (Ga. 1909)
  • Taylor v. State 63 S.E. 1116, (Ga. 1909)
  • Raysor v. State 63 S.E. 786, (Ga. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑