Jordan v. Strange
Jordan v. Strange
134 Ga. 351; 67 S.E. 881; 1910 Ga. LEXIS 196
Jordan v. Strange
Opinion of the Court
The verdict in this case was authorized by the evidence. No error was assigned except the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the .general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and to the weight of the evidence, and was without evidence to support it. There was no error in overruling the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.