Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912

Hamilton v. Smith

Hamilton v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided February 17, 1912 · Fish
137 Ga. 635; 73 S.E. 946; 1912 Ga. LEXIS 112

Hamilton v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Fish, O. J.

1. After the petition was amended by attaching thereto' a copy of the specifications constituting a part of the building contract, it was not subject to the grounds of special demurrer urged against it.

2. While there may have been some inaccuracies in the instructions excepted to, they were not, when considered in connection with the entire charge, sufficient to require a reversal.

*636February 17, 1912.Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior court. December 6, 1910. 'Maddox, McQamy <& Shumate, for plaintiff in error. C. D. McOutchen and W. E. Mann, contra.

3. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All ¡the Justices concur, except Sill, J., not presiding.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.