George v. Howard Piano Co.
George v. Howard Piano Co.
138 Ga. 95; 74 S.E. 756; 1912 Ga. LEXIS 206
Opinion of the Court
The court did not err in failing to instruct the jury in the respect indicated in the motion for a new trial; the assignments of error upon the instructions given were not meritorious; there was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.