West v. Shackelford
West v. Shackelford
138 Ga. 163; 74 S.E. 1079; 1912 Ga. LEXIS 241
West v. Shackelford
Opinion of the Court
1. When a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction is brought to the Supreme Court for review, the trial judge is authorized to grant a supersedeas upon such terms as may by him be deemed necessary to preserve the rights of the parties until the judgment of the Supreme Court can be had. Civil Code, § 5502; Stokes v. Stokes, 126 Ga. 804 (55 S. E. 1023). It is left, however, in the sound legal discretion of the judge to grant or refuse it. See Savannah, Florida
2. The judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a supersedeas in this case. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.