This was an extraordinary motion for new trial upon the ground of alleged newly discovered evidence. In view of the rebutting evidence submitted by the State on the hearing of the motion, and the improbability, considering the evidence upon the trial, that the alleged newly discovered evidence would produce a different result on another trial, the judgment refusing a new trial must be affirmed. See Malone v. State, 49 Ga. 221, and other cases collated in 14 Michie’s Dig. 398.

While I am of the opinion that the evidence on the trial was not sufficient to authorize the verdict, I concur in the opinion that the alleged newly discovered evidence would not probably produce a different result. Judgment affirmed.