The suit in this case having been brought by one alleging himself to be administrator of a decedent, and the defendant claiming by purchase under one of the heirs of such decedent, the evidence did not so clearly demand a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, at least as to the entire interest in the land, as to require the reversal of a first grant of a new trial after the rendition of such a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.