Arnold v. Stevens
Arnold v. Stevens
139 Ga. 495; 77 S.E. 579; 1913 Ga. LEXIS 484
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Norris v. Lynch (Ga. Ct. App. 1921)
- Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance v. Rawls (Ga. Ct. App. 1921)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
If the court erred in the admission of certain alleged irrelevant and immaterial evidence, it was not of such character as to require the grant of a new trial.
The court did not err in merely failing to instruct the jury as indicated in one of the grounds of the motion for new trial.
There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.