Edgeman v. Stewart
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Feckoury v. Maloney (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
- Ralls v. Jones (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
- Davis v. Lee (Ga. Ct. App. 1928)
- Harrell v. City of Quitman (Ga. Ct. App. 1915)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. This court will not reverse the judgment of the court below overruling the petition for certiorari, there being no sufficiently definite exceptions to the ruling or judgment which the petitioner sought to have corrected by the certiorari proceedings.
2. The petition for certiorari complained of an order requiring an obstruction to be removed from an alleged private way, passed after the introduction of evidence. No ruling on any question of law was set out or assigned as erf or; the only exception to the judgment or assignment was in the following language: “Petitioner avers that said court erred in so finding and in so ordering and in entering up judgment as aforesaid, all of which rulings and findings of said court petitioner assigns as error.” Wheeler v. Worley, 110 Ga. 513 (35 S. E. 639); Smith
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.