Reynolds Banking Co. v. Beeland
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Garrett v. Nicholson (Ga. 1960)
- Perry v. Hammock (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
- Brumfield v. Jackson (Ga. 1942)
- Kniepkamp v. Richards (Ga. 1941)
- Kniepkamp v. Richards (Ga. 1941)
- Morris v. Wilson (Ga. 1925)
- Walker v. State (Ga. 1922)
- Burney v. Southern Express Co. (Ga. 1916)
- Cook v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1916)
- Bussell v. Savannah Guano Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where the judge certifies a bill of exceptions, he is without jurisdiction to certify, under a supplemental certificate, certain statements as explanatory of the circumstances under which the first certificate was made.
2. A suit was brought by a sheriff, for the use of the plaintiff in fi. fa., to recover for the breach of a forthcoming bond, in which suit the plaintiff’s attorney had a personal interest. A verdict was directed by the court in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant sued out a bill of exceptions. After the expiration of the time within which service could have been legally perfected, the following acknowledgments of service were endorsed upon the bill of exceptions: “Due and legal service of the within bill of exceptions is hereby acknowledged, and all other .and further service or notice is hereby waived. J. E. Beeland, Sheriff.” “Service of the within bill of exceptions is hereby acknowledged; no right as to proper time waived. R. S. Foy & W. F. Weaver, attys. for defendant in error.” Held, that the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. Moss v. Burch, 99 Ga. 94 (24 S. E. 865); Dunlap v. Seals, 130 Ga. 350 (60 S. E. 851).
Writ of error dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.