While our opinion as to the questions dealt with in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, this day decided, has undergone no change, we concur in the judgment of reversal, because of the ruling in that ease.

These eases are controlled by the decision this day rendered in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, ante, 775. The points made in the present cases, additional to those there specifically dealt with, are not sufficient to require a different ruling. Under this ruling, it was error to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment reversed in each case.