Dorminey v. Mathis
Dorminey v. Mathis
146 Ga. 16; 90 S.E. 379; 1916 Ga. LEXIS 554
Opinion of the Court
1. There was no error sufficient to cause a reversal on account of any ruling admitting evidence to which proper objection was made.
2. Upon conflicting evidence, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.