Jones v. Howard
Jones v. Howard
146 Ga. 715; 92 S.E. 55; 1917 Ga. LEXIS 463
Jones v. Howard
Opinion of the Court
The assignments of error upon the refusal to rule out evidence, and upon the charge of the court on the subject of prescriptive title, even if sufficiently definite, show no cause for reversal. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict for the defendant, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.